|
ИСТИНА |
Войти в систему Регистрация |
Интеллектуальная Система Тематического Исследования НАукометрических данных |
||
Language, consciousness and culture: some suggestions to develop further the Moscow school of psycholinguisticsстатья
Информация о цитировании статьи получена из
Web of Science
Статья опубликована в журнале из перечня ВАК
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или Scopus
Дата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 24 февраля 2021 г.
- Авторы: Leonard S.P., Ufimtseva N.V., Markovina I.J.
- Журнал: Язык и культура
- Номер: 3
- Год издания: 2019
- Первая страница: 111
- Последняя страница: 131
- DOI: 10.17223/19996195/47/7
- Аннотация: The Moscow school of psycholinguistics offers an applied, NeoHumboldtian and Vygotskyian approach to the problem of how language consolidates the cognitive and cultural experience of a community. The Moscowschool of psycholinguistics places a great emphasis on culture as a source ofconceptualizing experience through cognitive structures such as word associations. It uses natural language semantics as a cognitive approach to meaningand shows how cognition is structured. Traditionally, the Moscow school hasperceived the problem of intercultural communication to lie in the systemicand symbolic association of words which are inherent in the local culture.Over the last few decades, Russian psycholinguists have tried to tease apartwhat they understand to be the cultural specificity of language consciousnessby analysing cross-linguistic data from free association experiments. The ultimate objective with this research is to map cross-cultural ontologies with aview to facilitating intercultural communication, but also as a means of appreciating more fully other cultures. With the ongoing trend of globalisation, cultural fluidity and the beckoning opportunities that Big Data analytics willsurely provide, it is perhaps time to pause to reconsider future avenues of research within the exciting research paradigm of cultural semantics. It is alsoan opportunity to reconfigure some of the terminology such as linguistic‘worldview’ which should be understood not as a fixed conception of theworld which envelops the thinking subject, but more as a continually evolving‘cultural mindset’ that articulates different perceptions of the world. As morelinguists question generative theories of language, interest in cultural semantics is expected to accelerate and might embrace the semantic association toolsthat the Moscow school has developed. This article makes a few tentativesuggestions as to how the Moscow school could refashion the renewed interest in cultural lexical associations and its related findings on pragmaticallyconditioned meanings. By engaging with ethnographic data, speech acts andby developing more of an ethnopragmatic approach that examines the diversity of speech practices and shows how both syntax and morphology encodegrammar, the Moscow school should be well positioned to continue to reapthe dividends of the recent interest in the language culture interface. As ethnography begins to team up with the use of digital data and Smartphone dictionary apps., our resources should become at some point in the future farmore comprehensive than they ever have been before. Attempts to disentanglethe language, culture, consciousness nexus from lexical associations based onBig Data analytics might be one of the beneficiaries of these developments.
- Добавил в систему: Уфимцева Наталья Владимировна