|
ИСТИНА |
Войти в систему Регистрация |
Интеллектуальная Система Тематического Исследования НАукометрических данных |
||
Comparing the efficacy of different types of repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment of pharmacoresistant spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis: 20Hz rTMS, iTBS or placeboстатья Тезисы
Статья опубликована в высокорейтинговом журнале
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или ScopusДата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 8 февраля 2017 г.
- Авторы: Korzhova I., Poydasheva A., Chervyakov A., Zakharova M.
- Журнал: European Journal of Neurology
- Том: 23
- Номер: 1, Supplement 1
- Год издания: 2016
- Издательство: Blackwell Publishing Inc.
- Местоположение издательства: United Kingdom
- Первая страница: 477
- Аннотация: Background: Spasticity is a significant factor in the development of disability. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be a promising tool for treatment. Introduction: Our aim was to assess the efficacy of navigated repetitive TMS (rTMS) in modulating lower limb spasticity. Methods: 13 patients (6 males, 7 females, mean age 45,64 ± 11,47 years) with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and lower spastic paraparesis received 10 sessions of two different types of rTMS or sham-stimulation over the motor hotspot of the tibialis anterior muscle (table 1). We assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale 2 (MFIS 2), Expanded disability status scale (EDSS), and Spasticity Subjective Evaluation Scale (SSES), pain level scale, dysfunction of the pelvic organs before, at the end of rTMS session, 2 and 12 weeks after. Study design Results: Patients who underwent both types of rTMS sessions showed a reduction of spasticity on MAS (table 2). There was no significant reduction of spasticity on MAS in placebo group. There was significant reduction of spasticity on SSES after iTBS protocol. This effect persisted for 12 weeks in most patients. In 20Hz and placebo group there were no significant changes on SSES. After stimulation in all 3 groups we noticed no significant differences in influence on fatigue (MFIS2), pain level, dysfunction of the pelvic organs.
- Добавил в систему: Червяков Александр Владимирович