ИСТИНА

Moscow and Moscow region form a powerful region, the level of environmental tension in which increases throughout the post-Soviet period. The accession of new territories to Moscow was largely explained by the desire to provide a new quality of solving environmental problems. However, it turned out that there are negative trends for these regions, primarily due to the increased impact of road transport and the scale of housing construction. The rapid and multidirectional development of the territory of New Moscow after 2013 led to the formation of areas with different trends in the transformation of the ecological situation. A significant part of New Moscow at the time of its entry into the capital can be considered as "reference", relatively clean from the point of view of pollution. However, it is for this reason that the ecological situation changes so rapidly: the number of pollution sources and the area of continuous development are increasing. As a result, the proportion between transformational and inherited factors changes rapidly in the formation of the ecological situation. It forms three basic types of districts. First, the conditionally clean, left over from the least developed sector of the Moscow region, where today there is an attempt to build a modern type of ecological culture in the form it is understood by the authorities, without interacting with real and potential residents. Secondly, territories neat the capitals, directly adjacent to Moscow and resetting industrial functions. Emissions to the atmosphere have significantly decreased, but pollution from motor vehicles has increased significantly. This type is intensively expanding, wedging in type 1 areas along the main highways, actively building multistage complexes all areas with good transport accessibility. Here the ecological situation is changing rapidly in the process of construction, but construction is proceeding according to new norms and plans, including the development of ecological infrastructure. Between the territories of types 1 and 2, an intermediate type of districts is allocated, to which all uncompetitive functions in comparison with housing construction were dropped. In these territories, the remnants of the Soviet-built agro-industrial complex. The problems are the most acute and multifaceted for these territories: it is most difficult to implement a unified policy, since there are many land users, but there is less money and less attention of the authorities. As a result, these territories develop according to the residual principle: the main focus is on renovation in Moscow, in the nearest belt or to new territories, the most interesting building lobby. As a result, the change in the status of the New Moscow territory gave acceleration to the development of the territory, but did not give a new quality of development. Ecologically clean technologies of the post-industrial city are still expensive, a new ecological culture is only painfully formed, and the affiliated territories are again used for building, recreation and storage of waste.